I. Policy Statement
The College of Saint Benedict and the Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, are committed to creating and maintaining an environment in which all members of the community are aware of and respect the rights and human dignity of every other member. Therefore, we will investigate and promptly seek the equitable resolution of allegations of discrimination relating to race, creed, religion, color, national origin/ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or disability.
Sexual harassment or other forms of harassment based on race, creed, religion, color, national origin/ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or disability are reprehensible, are antithetical to the mission of these institutions, and will not be tolerated. In institutions such as ours, which espouse Catholic and Benedictine values, every community member’s awareness of and respect for the rights and human dignity of every other member under gird community life. Attitudes of condescension, hostility, stereotyping, and other forms of bigotry and intolerance weaken the health of the community. Furthermore, discrimination and harassment compromise the integrity of a liberal arts education because they make the learning, residential and working environments hostile, intimidating, and offensive; they destroy opportunities to develop strong positive self-concepts and the sense of self-confidence which is essential to living out the ideals of a liberal education. In addition, persons who harass others compromise their own integrity and credibility. Consequently, neither the College of Saint Benedict nor the Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, will knowingly permit the violation of this policy.
II. The Law and Standards of Conduct
Discrimination or harassment relating to race, creed, religion, color, national origin/ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or disability is prohibited by both state and federal law under such Acts as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1992 and Sections 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibit discrimination against persons with disabilities; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and/or the Minnesota Human Rights Act.
A. Sexual Harassment
Sexual harassment, a form of discrimination based on sex, is defined in part as follows:
Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual or gender-based nature when:
Examples of Sexual Harassment
The determination of what constitutes sexual harassment depends upon the specific facts of each situation in the context in which the conduct occurs. Sexual harassment may take many forms. It may be subtle and indirect, or blatant and overt. It may be conduct affecting an individual of the opposite sex or conduct affecting an individual of the same sex. It may occur between peers or between individuals in a hierarchical relationship. If it meets the conditions set forth in the above definition, conduct such as the following may be considered sexual harassment:
Note: The College and the Order are in the process of revising the Consensual Relationship policy. Until replaced by a revised policy, this language shall continue to be applicable in responding to the issue of consensual amorous relationships.
B. Other Forms of Harassment
Harassment based on race, creed, religion, color, national origin/ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or disability is defined in part as follows: Verbal, non-verbal, or physical conduct that denigrates or shows hostility or aversion toward an individual or a group of individuals because of the race, creed, religion, color, national origin/ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or disability of an individual, or that of an individual’s relatives, friends or associates when: such conduct has the purpose or effect of substantially and unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work or academic performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working, residential or academic environment.
Examples of Harassment
The determination of what constitutes harassment depends upon the specific facts of each situation in the context in which the conduct occurs. Harassment may take many forms. It may be subtle and indirect, or blatant and overt. It may occur between peers or between individuals in a hierarchical relationship. If it meets the conditions set forth in the above definition, conduct such as the following may be considered discriminatory harassment: epithets, slurs, negative stereotyping or threatening, intimidating or hostile acts that relate to race, creed, religion, color, national origin/ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or disability; written or graphic material that is used for the purpose of denigrating or showing hostility or aversion toward an individual or a group of individuals because of race, creed, religion, color, national origin/ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or disability.
C. Hostile Environment
A “hostile environment,” as referred to in Paragraphs A and B above means a pervasive pattern of unwelcome conduct or communication (verbal, non-verbal, and/or physical) which has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering with an individual’s working, residential or academic environment, or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working, residential or educational environment.
The College of Saint Benedict and the Order of Saint Benedict are committed to the principles of free inquiry and free expression within the context of the Catholic and Benedictine traditions and in accordance with the principles of human rights and dignity, as outlined in the respective Faculty Handbooks. Within that context, all members of the community have the right to hold and to vigorously defend and promote their opinions, entering them into the life of the community, there to flourish or wither according to their merits. Respect for this right requires that members of the community tolerate the expression of opinions they may find to be distasteful or even abhorrent, keeping in mind that it is not the purpose nor the intent of this policy to chill or otherwise discourage the open discussion of controversial issues or the free exchange of opinions and ideas occurring within the academic setting.
The institutions are also committed to the principles of equal opportunity and non-discrimination. All members of the academic community have the right to participate in the academic enterprise without discrimination on the basis of race, creed, religion, color, national origin/ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or disability. Discriminatory harassment on the basis of these categories is not protected expression because such harassment compromises the integrity of these institutions, their tradition of intellectual freedom, and the trust placed in our community. Harassment on the basis of any of these characteristics contributes to a hostile environment that makes access to the academic enterprise inherently less than equal.
The purpose of this section is to provide guidance in the sensitive area where the right to free expression ends and prohibited, discriminatory harassment begins. Such prohibited harassment includes discriminatory conduct, both verbal and non-verbal, which has the purpose or reasonably foreseeable effect of insulting, stigmatizing, humiliating or otherwise interfering with the rights of an individual or a group of individuals on the basis of race, creed, religion, color, national origin/ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or disability, as outlined elsewhere in this policy. Ordinarily such conduct employs insulting, intimidating or otherwise outrageous words or non-verbal symbols that convey contempt, hostility or aversion on the basis of these categories, and is either addressed directly to the individual or individuals whom it insults or stigmatizes or can reasonably be understood to be directed toward such individuals, even if the conduct is not explicitly so addressed.
Whatever the boundaries of free inquiry and expression, the members of an educational community such as ours should be attentive to the feelings and sensibilities of others, and should voluntarily adopt the high standards of civility and good taste that reflect mutual respect, understanding and sensitivity among all members of our diverse community. In particular, members of the faculty represent the colleges and have a special role and position of authority with respect to students. They should treat students with respect and dignity and should be particularly sensitive to the impact of their words and opinions.
III. To Whom the Policy Applies
All community members will abide by this policy at all times, whether on campus or away from campus, when engaged in activities sponsored by the institution or which otherwise relate to the institution or its business. Such activities include, but are not limited to, professional meetings, classes, practica, seminars, study abroad programs, and all other activities involving or relating to the institution. Those who contract to use our campuses, instruct our students, supervise our students, or are employed by independent enterprises located on campus or seek to provide goods and services to our campuses are expected to adhere to the principles established by this policy.
Exclusion. The monks of Saint John’s Abbey are vowed to mutual respect between persons and a celibate way of life. Saint John’s Abbey views sexual assault and other violations of a person’s human rights as reprehensible. Should any infractions of human rights occur within the monastery between monk and monk (including novices and candidates) or between monks and visiting guests of the monastery; complaints to that effect will be investigated and resolved according to specific abbey policies and the procedures of ecclesiastical law.
All Community Members. All community members are responsible for ensuring that their conduct does not violate this policy. All community members who have observed others experiencing what they believe to be incidents of discrimination or harassment are encouraged to confront such conduct and report such conduct to the Human Rights Officer at once. Any community member who feels that he or she has experienced discrimination or harassment in violation of this policy has the responsibility for giving notice of the discriminatory behavior to the institution. (See Section V below.)
Supervisors. Institutional supervisors (See Section X, Definition of Terms) have the further responsibility to use their best efforts to assure that discrimination and harassment do not occur. Supervisors are responsible, therefore, for being fully familiar with the human rights policies, for informing those they supervise of the human rights policies, and for encouraging discussion of the implications of these policies in the learning, residential, and working environments of these institutions. When a supervisor receives a report of or otherwise identifies a problem as being one involving a potential claim of discrimination or harassment in violation of this policy, the supervisor shall report the alleged incident to the Human Rights Officer at once.
V. Reporting and Complaint Procedure
Members of the community who believe their human rights have been violated are encouraged to discuss the situation and to seek advice as soon as possible from the Human Rights Officer or any of the following: a supervisor, administrator, faculty member, department chair, resident director or faculty resident, and/or the Director or Associate Director of Human Resources. Advice concerning the submission of human rights complaints and the procedures for processing human rights complaints should be directed to a Human Rights Officer.
Any member of the community, who is not a supervisor, and who is contacted by a person with a complaint which may involve the person’s human rights is strongly encouraged to contact the Human Rights Officer.
All complaints, involving human rights issues will be processed and considered pursuant to the Joint Complaint Procedure for Human Rights Violations. After consulting with the Human Rights Officer, a Complainant may or may not choose to proceed with a complaint under the Joint Complaint Procedure for Human Rights Violations and/or civil and/or criminal legal processes. Furthermore, if the Complainant withdraws from the complaint process, the institution may proceed with a complaint, acting as the Complainant, in order to comply with the institution’s legal obligations and to assure the safety and well-being of all community members.
All who are involved in complaints of human rights violations have the right to request the prompt and competent investigation of the allegations. All who are involved or implicated in internal complaint procedures have the right to fair and impartial treatment.
Because of the sensitive nature of human rights complaints, the need to protect the privacy of the parties, the need to ward against retaliation and adverse publicity, and the interest in resolving complaints as quickly and effectively as possible, the institutions will rigorously defend the confidentiality interests of all parties involved in a human rights complaint process. These institutions will undertake reasonable efforts to protect the identity of all Complainants and Respondents and ensure that the actions resulting from the initiation of the Joint Complaint Procedure for Human Rights Violations are kept confidential, informing only those officials and individuals with a need to know in order to respond to the case. Confidentiality shall be observed by all persons involved in a complaint process.
Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, respect for fair process requires that the requirement of confidentiality not be interpreted as unduly limiting the ability of either party to a complaint to prepare and present his or her case, particularly during the formal stage of the complaint process. Furthermore, the requirement of confidentiality shall not be interpreted as unduly limiting the institution’s responsibility to investigate and take corrective action in response to human rights complaints. In addition, in cases of crimes of violence and sex offenses, federal confidentiality laws do not limit institutions in notifying Complainants of the final results of a disciplinary hearing. (FERPA Sec. 99.39).
Any person who initiates a complaint under any human rights policy shall do so without coercion or fear of reprisal. Retaliation against or harassment of any person involved in a complaint process (the Complainant, the Respondent, the investigator, a witness, a member of the hearing panel, etc.) may in and of itself constitute a human rights violation and may be pursued as such under the Joint Complaint Procedure for Human Rights Violations. Encouraging or aiding others to retaliate also violates this policy.
VIII. Malicious, False Reporting
A Complainant whose allegations are found to be both false and brought with malicious intent will be subject to disciplinary action as recommended by the Human Rights Officer.
If a mutually agreeable resolution is not reached at the consultative or informal complaint stage and a formal complaint is filed, upon a finding that a violation of the Human Rights Policy has occurred, disciplinary action as set forth in the appropriate handbook(s), up to and including termination of employment or expulsion from the academic community, may be imposed.
X. Definition of Terms
Terms used in this and related human rights documents shall be defined as follows:
Abbott John Klassen, OSB Edward Kocourek
Order of Saint Benedict Chair, Board of Trustees
Collegeville College of Saint Benedict
Approved August 1, 2006
For information regarding the Joint Human Rights Policy or to obtain a complete copy of the complaint procedures, contact Judy Bednar, faculty/staff human rights officer, (320) 363-5071 or Jody Terhaar, Dean of Students at CSB (320) 363-5270 or Michael Connolly, Dean of Students at SJU, (320) 363-3171.